| CRITERIA |
(D)
Meets Some Requirements |
(C+)
Meets All Requirements |
(A)
Exceeds Requirements |
SCORE |
A. ORGANIZATION
|
1. Completeness
and Timeliness |
Some entries missing or incomplete and/or submitted late |
All entries completed according to directions; submitted on time
|
All entries completed and organized correctly |
A |
2. Visual Appeal
(cover, artwork, layout)
|
Missing key element or elements; meets minimum standards |
Key elements demonstrate originality |
Key elements demonstrate creativity and style |
A |
3. Format (spelling, punctuation, grammar, usage, typing)
|
Entries contain several errors |
Entries are error-free |
Entries demonstrate high level of writing skills |
A |
Comments: Opted out of the Temple/Blackboard system based portfolio. Utilized appealing visual style which matches professional portfolio. Web site hosted on company server which enables the ability to maintain it at anytime throughout career.
|
B. EVIDENCE OF UNDERSTANDING
|
1. Knowledge of
Key Concepts |
Entries reflect recall and comprehension |
Entries reflect analysis and synthesis |
Entries reflect evaluation and application |
A |
| 2. Process |
Entries reflect basic understanding of topic |
Entries reflect high level of understanding |
Entries reflect high level of understanding and transfer |
A |
Comments: Shows evidence of individual concerns and goals based upon real experiences in the classroom.
|
C. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
|
1. Group Interactions |
Entries demonstrate minimum use of peer interaction |
Entries demonstrate peer and group interactions |
Entries demonstrate peer/cognitive coaching experiences |
A |
2. Problem Solving |
Entries demonstrate ability to identify problems |
Entries demonstrate ability to brainstorm solutions |
Entries demonstrate ability to implement creative solutions |
A |
3. Goal Attainment |
Some goals are not achieved |
All goals are achieved |
Some goals are exceeded |
N/A |
Comments: Time spent with peers demonstrates understanding of group concerns and the continued use of the peer group through the identified goals is evident. The participation in the group setting enabled the identification of system needs.
|
D. METACOGNITION
|
1. Artifact Reflections |
Reflections are missing or inappropriate |
Reflections provide insight into teacher’s thinking |
Reflections provide evidence of insight and thoughtfulness |
A |
2. Self-Assessment of Portfolio |
Self-Assessment is missing or lacks depth |
Self-Assessment reflects understanding of self |
Self-Assessment provides insight into professional growth |
A |
Comments: All components addressed except Goal Attainment (work in progress).
|
